Christian Lectionaries in America
Mike Ervin

Christian lectionaries are structured schedules of Scripture readings appointed for public worship. They grew out of the church’s ancient practice of assigning readings to particular days and seasons so congregations would hear the sweep of Scripture together rather than relying only on whatever a preacher chose that week. In the modern era the form most people meet in churches, especially in liturgical traditions, owes a great deal to the post-Vatican II Roman Catholic Ordo Lectionum Missae (1969), which introduced a multi-year cycle and substantially increased the amount of Scripture proclaimed in public worship. Protestant ecumenical work in the 1970s–1990s adapted and revised that pattern and produced the Common Lectionary and, after trial use and revision, the Revised Common Lectionary (RCL) published in 1992. The RCL deliberately balanced Gospel cycles with more regular Old Testament and epistolary readings and has become the de-facto shared Sunday lectionary for many U.S. denominations. 

Form and logic. The familiar three-year Sunday lectionary (Years A, B, C) organizes Gospel readings by year (A = Matthew, B = Mark, C = Luke, with John and Johannine material used across seasons such as Easter and certain holy days). A typical Sunday set in liturgical churches provides an Old Testament reading (or Acts in Eastertide), a Psalm (or portion of it), an Epistle or other New Testament reading, and a Gospel pericope; the aim is to give congregations exposure to different biblical writers in sequence rather than preaching entirely by theme. In some communions there is also an integrated daily lectionary (used in monasteries, clergy prayer offices, or by laity) that fills in much more Scripture over time. 

Who in America uses what. In the United States the RCL is widely used, often as an official or strongly encouraged option, by many mainline and liturgical Protestant bodies and has been adapted into local use by numerous churches: Episcopal/Anglican bodies, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), Presbyterian Church (USA), United Methodist Church, Reformed Church in America, United Church of Christ, many American Baptist congregations, Moravian churches, and others. The Roman Catholic Church uses its own 3-year Lectionary for Mass (derived from the same mid-20th-century liturgical renewal) and many Anglicans/Church of England provinces use the RCL or closely related material; the Orthodox churches follow a distinct Byzantine lectionary that is tied to their liturgical cycle and follows different patterns of texts and saints’ days. At the other end of the spectrum, many evangelical and non-liturgical congregations do not follow a formal ecumenical lectionary at all, preferring topical series or book-by-book preaching plans. (Lists of denominations that have adopted or commonly use the RCL are compiled by liturgical organizations and in denominational resources.) 

How much of the Bible gets heard (and why figures differ). One of the most frequently asked empirical questions is “what fraction of the Bible do lectionaries actually cover?” Answers vary because different counts use different assumptions (Sunday readings only versus Sunday+daily; whether Psalms or the deuterocanonical books are counted; whether partial verses and short pericopes are treated as full coverage). That said, careful tallies done by liturgical scholars and practitioners give a consistent picture:

  • If you look at the Roman Catholic three-year lectionary (Sunday + weekday cycles combined), the published tallies used by liturgical scholars indicate roughly 13–14% of the Old Testament (excluding Psalms), about 72% of the New Testament, and especially high coverage of the Gospels (often cited near 89–90% for the Gospels), with the aggregate New Testament coverage in the 70–72% range when daily cycles are included. These figures reflect the substantial expansion of Scripture reading built into the post-1960s lectionary reforms. 
  • If you restrict the count to Sunday readings only (which is useful because many worshippers attend Sunday but not daily offices), the proportion drops: figures commonly cited place Sunday-only coverage of the New Testament somewhere in the 40%–70% range depending on how the researcher counts short pericopes and repeated Gospel episodes; Old Testament Sunday coverage is significantly lower—often in the low teens of a percent range for many lectionaries if you exclude Psalms. In short: daily lectionaries materially increase coverage; three-year cycles with daily readings come closest to reading large swaths of Scripture aloud in worship over time. Sources that compare different counting methods show exactly these differences and explain the methodological reasons for the range. 

Because the RCL was deliberately designed to allow more Old Testament and wisdom readings than some earlier Protestant lectionaries, congregations using the RCL plus optional “semi-continuous” or daily OT schemes will encounter a broader sampling of Hebrew Scripture than congregations that only use the RCL’s principal Sunday picks without augmentation. The practical takeaway for a parish organizer or a website audience is that a lectionary’s nominal “coverage” depends heavily on which variant (Sunday only, daily, semi-continuous OT option) is counted. 

Major published criticisms (and common responses). As lectionaries spread across denominational lines, a steady body of critique emerged from various theological angles. Criticisms fall into several recurring themes:

  • Fragmentation and loss of context. Critics argue the three-pericope Sunday framework frequently isolates verses from their literary or theological context, encouraging topical preaching and devotional snapshots rather than whole-book, contextual exposition. This charge appears in both academic articles and pastoral blogs: readers and preachers may miss narrative arcs or sustained argumentation in biblical books when only short lections are read. Common responses are pragmatic: pastors pair lectionary preaching with supplementary evening classes, midweek studies, or periodic “book preaching” series; some congregations adopt semi-continuous options that read longer stretches of a book over a season. 
  • Selective omission and thematic bias. Conservative critics, both Protestant and Catholic, have sometimes complained that modern lectionaries edit out or minimize morally awkward or theologically uncomfortable texts, or that editorial choices produce a doctrinal slant. Publications across the spectrum have documented perceived editorial shaping or omissions in particular passages; defenders respond that no ritual lectionary can include everything and that liturgical planners must weigh pastoral and seasonal appropriateness. Where omissions are felt to be systemic, some parishes supplement worship with additional readings or teach on those neglected passages in other forums. 
  • Predictability and liturgical conformity. Some pastors and congregations find the lectionary constraining, especially if a community wishes to respond to a local crisis or teach in a topical sequence (e.g., a evangelistic series or a focused pastoral catechesis) that the appointed readings do not support. The practical counterbalance is that most communions regard the lectionary as a resource rather than an inflexible law; many congregations mix lectionary use with occasional topical series, or they choose alternative lectionaries that better match their aims. 
  • Overemphasis on the Gospels (or conversely, insufficient Old Testament narrative continuity). Some critics say the lectionary’s distribution gives disproportionate weight to Gospel episodes (because the three-year scheme aims to let congregations “hear” a Gospel writer in sequence), while others lament that the Old Testament’s large narrative arcs, such as the exile and return, or the Wisdom corpus, are still presented in disconnected snippets. These critiques gave rise to alternatives such as the Narrative Lectionary (a project from Luther Seminary/WorkingPreacher), which intentionally strings Sunday readings into canonical narrative order for a nine-month school-year cycle so worshipers can hear major biblical narratives in sequence. Proponents argue this design improves biblical literacy; opponents say the Narrative Lectionary can cover less raw material overall and may reduce the RCL’s ecumenical advantage. 

Those broad criticisms have generated practical remedies that many congregations already use: choose a semi-continuous plan for epistles or Old Testament sections, employ occasional multi-week preaching series that go through whole books, use the daily office or midweek lectionary to supplement Sunday selections, and encourage small groups and adult education to follow a book-by-book reading plan in parallel with Sunday worship. Another option congregations use is intentional deviation: using the RCL most weeks but setting several Sundays aside each year to preach through an entire biblical book in sequence. 

Scholarly and pastoral conversations. Liturgical scholars and pastors continue to debate the lectionary’s theological and pastoral effects. Some scholars emphasize the lectionary’s gift: it imposes a corporate rhythm that keeps the church’s attention on the seasons of salvation history and forces preachers to address texts they might otherwise avoid. Others emphasize the pedagogical deficits and the need for parishes to be intentional about filling in gaps. Publications from WorkingPreacher, denominational liturgy offices, and independent commentators provide a steady stream of commentary, case studies, and alternative proposals; these conversations are the best places to follow innovations (for instance, adaptations that increase Old Testament continuity or that reconfigure psalmody). 

Practical summary for a website reader or small church leader. If your purpose is to help readers decide how to handle Scripture reading in worship, the practical points are straightforward: the RCL and the Catholic Lectionary provide a broadly ecumenical, seasonally attuned, three-year curriculum that significantly increases the Scripture publicly read in worship compared with many older single-year schemes, but the precise amount of the Bible “heard” depends on whether a congregation uses only Sunday readings or also follows weekday/semi-continuous options. Critics rightly call attention to lost contexts and selective omissions; those defects are often remedied by intentional pairing of lectionary Sundays with book-focused preaching, midweek adult education, and alternative lectionaries (such as the Narrative Lectionary) for communities that want a contiguous biblical story.

Christian Lectionaries in America

Links
<<   Home   >>