Philosophy of Religion Overview
Mike Ervin

Philosophy of Religion Overview

The teaching here is developed from a Teaching Company book on Philosophy of Religion taught by Professor James Hall at the University of Richmond, outlining the course scope, and lecture topics.

The teaching explores the philosophical examination of ethical monotheism, focusing on the existence of God and the epistemological questions surrounding it.

What is Philosophy?

Philosophy is a practical discipline that involves asking and answering meta-questions through analytical and synthetic methods.

  • Philosophy is often misunderstood as merely subjective feelings or reflections.
  • It consists of four types of questions: fact, value, explanation, and meta-questions.
  • Philosophical analysis locates presuppositions and implications, while synthesis integrates ideas into a coherent whole.

What is Religion?

Religion is a complex system of beliefs that varies widely across cultures, but ethical monotheism serves as a focal point for this course.

  • Ethical monotheism is the common core of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.
  • Definitions of religion can be essential, family resemblance, ostensive, or operational.
  • Common characteristics of religions include belief in the supernatural, a supreme being, life after death, and moral practices.

What is Philosophy of Religion?

Philosophy of religion critically examines religious beliefs and practices, distinguishing itself from apologetics, comparative religion, psychology, history, and theology.

  • It is not apologetics, which defends faith, but rather a critical inquiry into religious claims.
  • It is not comparative religion, which describes different religions without evaluating beliefs.
  • The central question is whether religious knowledge is possible, and the focus is on ethical monotheism.

 How is the Word “God” Generally Used?

The term "God" is used in various contexts, primarily designating a being worthy of worship, but its meaning can vary significantly.

  • "God" is a title, not a name, and can refer to various entities across different religions.
  • Worship involves veneration, prayer, and rituals directed towards a being considered divine.
  • Different religious frameworks (e.g., animism, polytheism, monotheism) define "God" in distinct ways.

How Do Various Theists Use the Word “God”?

Theism encompasses various forms of belief in God, with ethical monotheism being the most articulated in terms of divine characteristics.

  • Theism includes polytheism, dualism, and monotheism, with monotheism being the focus of this teaching.
  • Monotheism emphasizes the non-contingency of God, known as aseity, which means God is not limited by anything else.
  • Key attributes of God in monotheism include omniscience and omnipotence, raising questions about divine intentions and human actions.

Ethical Monotheism and Its Challenges

Ethical monotheism posits that a worthy deity must be all-powerful, all-knowing, and morally flawless, raising questions about the existence of such a being in a flawed world.

  • Ethical monotheism requires a divine being without moral flaws.
  • Worship is reserved for a being that is all-powerful, all-knowing, and good.
  • The existence of evil and suffering challenges the notion of a benevolent deity.
  • Philosophical questions arise about the knowledge of such a being's existence and the nature of divine intentions.

Understanding Knowledge in Religious Contexts

The teaching explores the nature of knowledge, particularly in relation to the existence of God, emphasizing the importance of justification and evidence.

  • Knowledge is traditionally defined as "justified true belief."
  • The focus is on the justification aspect, particularly in religious contexts.
  • Radical skepticism questions the possibility of knowing anything, but practical reasons support the assumption that knowledge is attainable.
  • Distinctions are made between what we know, believe, and disbelieve, with evidence being crucial for claims of knowledge.

Types and Quality of Evidence

This section discusses the various kinds of evidence that can support beliefs and the criteria for determining good evidence.

  • Evidence can be experiential, rational, authoritative, intuitive, or revelatory.
  • Good evidence should be relevant, non-equivocal, non-circular, replicable, and testable.
  • The amount and quality of evidence required depend on the context and stakes involved.
  • Moving from disbelief to belief involves a testable process of reasoning based on evidence.

Arguments for the Existence of God

The teaching outlines the importance of arguments in determining the existence of God, focusing on cosmological, teleological, and ontological arguments.

  • Arguments are used to explain observed realities and assess competing accounts.
  • The cosmological argument posits that everything must have a cause, leading to the idea of a first cause.
  • The teleological argument infers design in nature, suggesting a designer.
  • The ontological argument claims that the very concept of God necessitates God's existence.

The Ontological Argument Explained

The ontological argument asserts that God's existence is inherent in the concept of God, independent of experience.

  • A priori reasoning is used to argue for God's existence based on definitions. ​
  • Anselm's formulation states that God is "that than which no greater can be conceived."
  • Critics like Gaunilo and Kant challenge the argument, claiming it does not prove existence in a factual sense. ​
  • The argument is seen as valid but may not lead to the conclusion of a singular, worship-worthy deity.

Critiques of the Ontological Argument

Critics argue that the ontological argument fails to demonstrate God's existence, highlighting its limitations. ​

  • Gaunilo's perfect island analogy illustrates the absurdity of the argument. ​
  • Kant argues that existence is not a property that can be inferred from definitions. ​
  • A priori arguments yield only analytic conclusions, not synthetic ones about matters of fact. ​
  • The argument may be valid against idolatry but does not confirm the existence of a deity.

The Cosmological Argument's Structure

The cosmological argument seeks to establish God's existence through the principle of sufficient reason, asserting that everything must have a cause. ​

  • It posits that every event has a cause, leading to the necessity of a first cause. ​
  • The argument can be presented in serial or aggregate forms, both concluding that an uncaused cause must exist.​
  • Critics argue that the cosmological argument does not necessarily lead to a single, worship-worthy deity.

Limitations of the Cosmological Argument

The cosmological argument faces challenges regarding its conclusions about the nature of the universe's cause.

  • Ockham's razor suggests that simpler explanations should be preferred, limiting the need for a complex divine cause. ​
  • The argument does not necessarily imply that the cause is worthy of worship or possesses divine attributes. ​
  • Multiple independent causes could exist, undermining the monotheistic claim. ​

The Teleological Argument's Basis

The teleological argument infers God's existence from the apparent design in nature, suggesting an intelligent designer.

  • It emphasizes recognizable design and intention in the universe.
  • William Paley's analogy of a watchmaker illustrates the argument's premise. ​
  • Critics argue that the argument may not adequately account for the complexity and imperfections in nature.

Critiques of the Teleological Argument

Skeptics challenge the teleological argument for inferring too much from limited data and ignoring contrary evidence. ​

  • The argument may engage in explanatory overkill by assuming a divine designer with infinite attributes.
  • It fails to account for negative aspects of the world, such as suffering and evil.
  • The rise of evolutionary theory provides alternative explanations for complexity without invoking a designer.

The Role of Divine Encounters

Many believers cite personal encounters with the divine as evidence of God's existence, bypassing traditional arguments. ​

  • Historical and contemporary figures claim direct experiences of God. ​
  • Such encounters are often viewed as self-evident and do not require inferential reasoning.
  • However, interpretations of these experiences can vary widely, raising questions about their reliability.

Interpretation of Divine Encounters

The interpretation of divine encounters is crucial, as different perspectives can lead to varying conclusions about their significance. ​

  • Encounters require interpretation, which can introduce bias and ambiguity. ​
  • The reliability of such experiences is often questioned, as they can be construed in multiple ways. ​
  • A conservative approach suggests that interpretations should be critically evaluated rather than accepted uncritically.

The Problem of Evil in Monotheism

The existence of evil poses a significant challenge to ethical monotheism, questioning the nature of a benevolent deity. ​

  • The presence of suffering and injustice raises doubts about the character of the divine designer.
  • Critics argue that the existence of evil is incompatible with the notion of an all-good, all-powerful God.
  • This issue is central to discussions about the validity of theistic arguments and the nature of faith.

The Problem of Evil in Ethical Monotheism

The teaching discusses the challenges posed by the existence of evil to the belief in a benevolent and omnipotent God. ​

  • Ethical monotheists assert that the world is designed and reflects the designer's character. ​
  • The presence of evil, including natural disasters and human atrocities, raises questions about the nature of the designer. ​
  • Examples of evil include historical figures like Hitler and natural phenomena like earthquakes and diseases.
  • The argument concludes that if the world is flawed, its designer may also be flawed and unworthy of worship. ​

Classifying Types of Evil

The teaching categorizes various forms of evil and their implications for the existence of God. ​

  • Three main types of evil are identified: individual actions, social phenomena, and natural disasters. ​
  • Individual evils include actions by figures like Osama Bin Laden and Theodore Kaczynski.
  • Social evils can be intended (e.g., eugenics) or unintended (e.g., environmental impacts). ​
  • Natural evils encompass events like meteor impacts and diseases that occur without human input. ​

Arguments Against the Existence of God

The teaching outlines logical arguments that suggest the existence of evil contradicts the existence of a perfect God. ​

  • If a designer is worthy of worship, their creations should be flawless. ​
  • The world is not flawless, indicating that the designer may not be worthy of worship. ​
  • The argument follows a logical structure that leads to the conclusion that if the world is flawed, the designer cannot be God. ​

Responses to the Problem of Evil

The teaching presents various responses to the argument from evil, including theodicies. ​

  • One response is to deny the validity of the argument by rejecting modus tollens. ​
  • Another response is to argue that the world is not flawed or that evils are necessary for greater goods. ​
  • The teaching mentions the concept of free will as a justification for the existence of evil. ​

Non-Justifying Theodicies

The teaching explores the idea that some evils may not require justification to be compatible with belief in God. ​

  • Some argue that perceived flaws in the world are misinterpretations of a perfect design. ​
  • Others claim that evils stem from human actions rather than divine will, excusing God from blame. ​
  • The notion of logical necessity suggests that good cannot exist without evil, complicating moral responsibility. ​

Justifying Evil Through Greater Goods

The teaching discusses the justification of evil as necessary for achieving greater goods. ​

  • Evils may be necessary for God's glory or as object lessons for moral behavior. ​
  • Some argue that suffering leads to the development of virtues like bravery and generosity. ​
  • The teaching raises questions about the extent to which suffering is necessary for moral growth.

Justifying Natural Evil

The teaching examines the justification of natural evils and their implications for divine existence. ​

  • Some argue that natural evils are consequences of human wrongdoing or serve as punishments. ​
  • The teaching critiques the plausibility of these justifications, especially regarding innocent beings suffering. ​
  • It questions whether natural evils can be reconciled with a loving and just God. ​

Justifying Human Evil Through Free Will

The teaching focuses on the free will theodicy as a justification for human evil. ​

  • The argument posits that freedom requires the potential for evil, making it necessary for moral choice. ​
  • Critics question why an omnipotent God could not create beings that always choose good. ​
  • The text also discusses the implications of demonic influences on human actions.

The Role of Faith and Evidence

The teaching explores the relationship between faith and evidence in religious belief. ​

  • Many believers argue that faith transcends evidence and rationality. ​
  • The teaching critiques the idea that faith can exist independently of evidence or logical reasoning.
  • It suggests that a disconnect between faith and evidence may lead to irrational beliefs. ​

Paradigms and Their Impact on Understanding

The teaching introduces the concept of paradigms and their influence on understanding religious and scientific discourse. ​

  • Paradigms shape how individuals interpret experiences and categorize knowledge. ​
  • The text discusses the incommensurability of rival paradigms, making it difficult to compare them. ​
  • It emphasizes the importance of evaluating paradigms based on their effectiveness and adaptability.

Evaluating and Choosing Paradigms

The teaching concludes with a discussion on how paradigms can be evaluated and changed.

  • Paradigm shifts can occur through exposure to new ideas or experiences. ​
  • The text examines the reasons why individuals may resist changing their paradigms. ​
  • It highlights the importance of having criteria for assessing the effectiveness of different paradigms. ​

Intentional Paradigm Change and Culture

The teaching discusses how intentional paradigm changes occur within cultural and scientific contexts.

  • Paradigm shifts can be intentional and are not limited by the notion of incommensurability.
  • Changes occur within existing paradigms, influenced by cultural inheritance and intellectual discourse.
  • Models for intentional change include capitulation to new cultures, assimilation, and language immersion. ​
  • Responses to intentional change can stem from discontent, exposure to new ideas, or transformative experiences.

Language Games in Theistic Discourse

This section explores the concept of language games and their application in theistic discussions. ​

  • Language games, as proposed by Wittgenstein, emphasize the use of language over its meaning. ​
  • Different language games have distinct rules, and not all can be evaluated by the same criteria. ​
  • Theistic discourse includes various language games such as promises, moral commands, and storytelling. ​
  • Evaluating theistic language requires understanding its unique felicity conditions rather than applying scientific standards.

Fabulation: Theism as Storytelling

The teaching analyzes religious discourse as a form of storytelling aimed at conveying moral truths. ​

  • Religious stories serve various purposes, including moral instruction and cultural identity. ​
  • Effective stories need to resonate with truth, be believable, and have a clear point. ​
  • Common themes in religious stories include moral frameworks, group cohesion, and comfort in adversity. ​
  • The effectiveness of a story is assessed based on its clarity, credibility, and ability to motivate behavior. ​

Theistic Stories and Moral Frameworks

This section examines how theistic narratives contribute to moral understanding and cultural cohesion. ​

  • Theistic stories often articulate moral values more effectively than prescriptive rules. ​
  • They can provide a sense of authority and motivation for moral behavior through narratives of judgment and reward.​
  • However, reliance on divine authority can undermine personal responsibility and autonomy. ​
  • Theism can both uphold cultural values and resist social reform, leading to potential stagnation. ​

The Role of Theism in Social Reform

The teaching discusses the dual role of theism in both preserving and reforming societal values. ​

  • Theism can reinforce existing power structures but also inspire social change through prophetic narratives. ​
  • Examples of repression include justifications for slavery and gender inequality, while reform examples include abolition and suffrage movements. ​
  • The tension between priestly and prophetic traditions within theism reflects broader societal struggles for progress. ​
  • Both theistic and secular narratives can contribute to cultural critique and reform efforts.

Conclusions on Theistic Discourse

The final section summarizes the philosophical reflections on the nature of theistic claims and their implications.

  • The existence of God cannot be definitively proven or disproven, leading to a Scottish verdict on the matter.
  • Religious claims are better understood as expressions of faith rather than factual assertions. ​
  • Theistic discourse enriches the understanding of human experience by adding an intentional dimension to events. ​
  • The ongoing dialogue between theistic and secular perspectives is essential for cultural and moral development.

Historical Context of Philosophers

The text provides biographical notes on significant philosophers and their contributions to the fields of philosophy and religion.

  • David Hume (1711–1776): Scottish philosopher known for empiricism and works like "A Treatise of Human Nature." ​
  • William James (1842–1910): American philosopher and psychologist, focused on religion and mysticism; authored "Varieties of Religious Experience." ​
  • St. John of the Cross (1542–1591): Spanish mystic and poet, known for "The Ascent of Mt. Carmel."
  • Immanuel Kant (1724–1804): German philosopher who critiqued Hume's empiricism; authored "Critique of Pure Reason." ​
  • Sir Anthony Kenny (1931–): British philosopher with interests in moral philosophy and philosophical theology. ​
  • Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855): Danish philosopher and early existentialist, known for "Either/Or." ​
  • Thomas Kuhn (1922–1996): American philosopher of science, known for "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." ​
  • C. S. Lewis (1898–1963): English writer and lay apologist, known for "The Chronicles of Narnia." ​
  • Alasdair MacIntyre (1929–): Scottish philosopher known for "After Virtue." ​
  • Kai Nielsen (1926–): North American philosopher critical of theism; authored "Ethics without God." ​
  • Rudolf Otto (1869–1937): German theologian known for "The Idea of the Holy." ​
  • William Paley (1743–1805): Anglican theologian known for "Natural Theology." ​
  • Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914): American philosopher known for pragmatism and logic. ​
  • Alvin Plantinga (1932–): American philosopher known for his work in philosophy of religion. ​
  • Bertrand Russell (1872–1970): English philosopher and logician known for "Principles of Mathematics." ​
  • Gilbert Ryle (1900–1976): English philosopher known for "The Concept of Mind." ​
  • John R. Searle (1932–): American philosopher of language known for "Speech Acts." ​
  • Richard Swinburne (1934–): English philosopher known for works on the existence of God. ​
  • St. Teresa of Avila (1515–1582): Spanish mystic known for "The Interior Castle." ​
  • Paul Tillich (1886–1965): German-American theologian known for "The Courage to Be." ​
  • Voltaire (1694–1778): French philosopher known for "Candide." ​
  • William of Ockham (c. 1280–c. 1349): English Scholastic known for Ockham's razor.
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951): Influential philosopher known for "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus."

Essential Readings in Philosophy

The teaching lists essential readings that provide foundational knowledge in the philosophy of religion. ​

  • John Hick's "Philosophy of Religion" is a definitive introduction to analytic philosophy of religion.
  • E. D. Klemke's "Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives on Perennial Issues" offers a wide range of philosophical issues. ​
  • Timothy A. Robinson's "God" is a well-balanced collection of theistic philosophical issues.

Recommended Readings for Further Study

The text suggests additional readings that enhance understanding of philosophical concepts and arguments. ​

  • John Hick's "Classical and Contemporary Readings in the Philosophy of Religion" includes many essays not found elsewhere. ​
  • Jay F. Rosenberg's "The Practice of Philosophy: A Handbook for Beginners" is a practical guide for newcomers to philosophy.

Supplementary Readings on Religion

The text provides a list of supplementary monographs that delve into philosophical issues related to religion. ​

  • Karen Armstrong's "A History of God" traces the development of the concept of God in major religions. ​
  • Martin Buber's "I and Thou" explores human moral relationships through a personal concept of God. ​
  • David Hume's "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" critiques traditional arguments for God's existence. ​

General Philosophy and Reference Works

The text includes general philosophy references that are useful for broader philosophical inquiries. ​

  • Robert Audi's "The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy" is a reliable reference for philosophical terms. ​
  • Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" is a classic introduction to key philosophical issues.

Philosophy of Religion Overview

                                            Links
                                    <<   Home   >>